Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Hamilton's avatar

Great piece, Simeon. This is the paradox, isn't it? I've re-stacked your words on productivity: they can't be improved upon. I'm an old man now, have had a good life and *still* at this age (73) cannot always turn off the productivity button. Perhaps this is one's life work: to disengage from the "forces" (inadequate word, too simplistic) that cause us to *strive*. To create is beautiful; striving sucks the beauty out of it.

Expand full comment
Liselyn Adams's avatar

I have had a lot of fun running your words through my head since reading them. I think I have finally concluded that we profoundly agree by wholly different means, which demonstrates your anti-boxification stand (if I may offer a silly improvement on your lovely word).

At first, I thought we were very different humans indeed. I am 70, but have never been a person to sit and look at the view for ages. I don't rush, but I move. I try hard to put motion, and not just emotion, into my playing. I love to move. I even like feeling physically powerful, or as powerful as a 5'1" small person can. When I see a view, I want to walk through it, see it from every part, from the inside.

But we are not different - we are just embracing non-rushedness and our surroundings differently. I am being there by moving, you by stillness. These are not binary opposites, simply different ways of exploring and breathing the space. I love this nuance. Neither measures and counts. I think some of our fake difference might come from your instrument being one of initialising the whole sound with one move, and mine being one of continuous movement (I'm a flutist). Both explore, engage, and never really arrive.

It is fabulous that music can use both ways at the same time. It gives us a place to sit still and stay connected, all while feeling every movement, however minuscule or grand. Thank you for getting me to sit down and think a while!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts